\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Effect of promotion on intervention ICS adoption in matched NGO/non-NGO villages}
\begin{adjustbox}{max width=\textwidth}
\label{t:continued-own-use}
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\toprule
& (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) \\ \cmidrule(lr){2-3} \cmidrule(lr){4-5}
& \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\mathbbm{1} \left( \text{Owns intervention ICS} \right)$} &  \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\mathbbm{1} \left( \text{Uses intervention ICS} \right)$} \\  \midrule
\({POST}_1\)&       0.012*  &       0.014   &      0.0039   &      0.0068   \\
            &    (0.0064)   &    (0.0091)   &    (0.0038)   &    (0.0066)   \\ \addlinespace
\({POST}_2\)&       0.039** &       0.027*  &       0.027** &       0.020*  \\
            &     (0.016)   &     (0.016)   &     (0.011)   &     (0.011)   \\ \addlinespace
\({TREATMENT}_j \times {POST}_1\)&        0.41***&        0.33***&        0.29***&        0.21***\\
            &     (0.030)   &     (0.047)   &     (0.026)   &     (0.034)   \\ \addlinespace
\({TREATMENT}_j \times {POST}_2\)&        0.39***&        0.34***&        0.23***&        0.20***\\
            &     (0.034)   &     (0.053)   &     (0.027)   &     (0.042)   \\ \addlinespace
\({NGO}_j \times {POST}_1\)&               &     -0.0046   &               &     -0.0068   \\
            &               &     (0.013)   &               &    (0.0066)   \\ \addlinespace
\({NGO}_j \times {POST}_2\)&               &       0.027   &               &       0.016   \\
            &               &     (0.034)   &               &     (0.025)   \\ \addlinespace
\({TREATMENT}_j \times {NGO}_j \times {POST}_1\)&               &        0.16***&               &        0.16***\\
            &               &     (0.058)   &               &     (0.048)   \\ \addlinespace
\({TREATMENT}_j \times {NGO}_j \times {POST}_2\)&               &       0.098   &               &       0.061   \\
            &               &     (0.070)   &               &     (0.056)   \\
\midrule
Baseline non-NGO control mean & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
Household fixed-effects & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes \\
\(N\)       &       2,829   &       2,829   &       2,829   &       2,829   \\
Adjusted \(R^2\)&        0.56   &        0.56   &        0.34   &        0.35   \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\begin{tablenotes}
{\setlength\labelsep{0pt}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes.} The outcomes variables are ownership (columns 1--2) and use (columns 3--4) of at least one of the two intervention ICS as measured during baseline, and midline and endline follow-up surveys (conducted approximately three and fifteen months after the start of the intervention, respectively). The outcome variable for ownership is an indicator that equals 1 if household \(i\) in hamlet \(j\) reports owning at least one of the two ICS promoted during the intervention in survey round \(t\); for use, it is an indicator that equals 1 if the household---conditional on ownership---reports having used at least one of these two ICS in the past week. The even-numbered columns present the results of estimating the triple-differences specification outlined in Equation \eqref{e:triple-diff}. The accompanying odd-numbered columns present results from estimating a double-differences specification without NGO-specific interactions for comparison. Standard errors (in parentheses) are clustered at the hamlet level. \sym{*} \(p<0.10\), \sym{**} \(p<0.05\), \sym{***} \(p<0.01\).}
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{adjustbox}
\end{table}
